The article states that the coin that was found at the Native American site is not genuine. The professor, in the lecture, explains that a lot of archaeologist believed that this coin is not fake and refutes each of the author's reason.
First, the reading claim that due to the great distance between the places where the coin was discovered and the Norse settlements, the coin is not authentic. However, the professor argues that there are many historical objects that have been found far from their expected places. In addition, he says that Native American was interested in far away things. Hence, it's completely possible that this coin was genuine.
Second, the reading passage says no body have found any other coins like that in the Canadian sites where the Norse inhabited there. The professor counter this point by stating that when the Norse came back to the Europe, they had packed all of their valuable possession. Therefore, as the silver coin was a valuable for the Norse people, They absolutely took all of them.
Third, the reading makes the argumentation that because North American did not consider silver coins as money, the Norse didn't carry them when they travel to the North America. The professor refutes this claims by pointing out that silver was very appealing for any people and they can use them in the jewelries. Thus, the Norse may be carry this silver coin to trade with American people.
- How do movies and television influence people's behavior.? Give reasons and examples to support your answer. 89
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TOPIC # 36 Choose one of the following transportation vehicles and explain why you think it has changed people’s lives. (Automobiles, bicycles, airplanes) 71
- 72
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun archaeologist seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of archaeologists'.
Suggestion: a lot of archaeologists
...rofessor, in the lecture, explains that a lot of archaeologist believed that this coin is not fake and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
...e. Second, the reading passage says no body have found any other coins like that in...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nsider silver coins as money, the Norse didnt carry them when they travel to the Nort...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, may, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90082644628 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34665634124 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54132231405 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9428104193 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8333333333 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.529765773804 0.272083759551 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197856720143 0.0996497079465 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939357242365 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324783576229 0.162205337803 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223456498039 0.0443174109184 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.