TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to

The article claims that the coin, which was discovered at a Native American archaeological site, is not genuine piece of historical evidence but a historical fake and provides three reasons of support. In contrast, the professor expresses many archaeologists believe this coin can be a genuine piece of historical evidence; hence, she refutes each of the author's reasons.

First, the passage asserts that the coin was discovered is locates very far from others sites documenting a Norse presence in North America Remains, so it could not be a guanine piece of historical. Conversely, the speaker opposes this point by saying that many historical pieces were discovered in this location. In addition, the North could travel a great distance and lost this coin during their travels.

Second, the reading states that if the coin is a historical piece, archaeology should found other coins in the Canadian site, while they have been found no other coins. On the contrary, the speaker explains that the Norse keep their coins in a pack and it is possible they took the coins back when they went to Europe.

In the third place, the text claims that there is not logical reason for bringing the coin from Europe to America, because the North knew that they can not trade with native North American by these coins. In contrast, the professor refutes this point by saying that the coin can be attractive for native people, because it was unusual, beauty. So, the Norse can use of the coin as a jewelry trade with native people.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'while', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'on the contrary', 'in the third place']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247386759582 0.261695866417 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.146341463415 0.158904122519 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101045296167 0.0723426182421 140% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0278745644599 0.0435111971325 64% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0348432055749 0.0277247811725 126% => OK
Prepositions: 0.1393728223 0.128828473217 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0313588850174 0.0370669169778 85% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.51355319069 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00696864111498 0.0208969081088 33% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00348432055749 0.00154638098197 225% => OK
Determiners: 0.1393728223 0.128158765124 109% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0243902439024 0.0158828679856 154% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00696864111498 0.0114777025283 61% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1525.0 1645.83664459 93% => OK
No of words: 258.0 271.125827815 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91085271318 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.341085271318 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.255813953488 0.287516216867 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.15503875969 0.187439937562 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.093023255814 0.113142543107 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51355319069 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527131782946 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 50.8833125925 53.8517498576 94% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 25.8 21.7502111507 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9048972212 49.3711431718 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.5 132.220823453 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 21.7502111507 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 0.878197800319 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 51.3813953488 50.5018328374 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.0 1.90840788429 105% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.746935167081 0.549887131256 136% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.192208855295 0.142949733639 134% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0848018797866 0.0787303798458 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.710234875103 0.631733273073 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.104720793857 0.139662658121 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.385546737418 0.266732575781 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986290688794 0.103435571967 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.354475428703 0.414875509568 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0458103871633 0.0530846634433 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.527377234897 0.40443939384 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596201782325 0.0528353158467 113% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.