tpo 44 the silver coin that was discovered in the American site is related to the Norse
The material discusses the origin of the silver coin that was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the US. While the reading claims three reasons to cast a doubt that this coin is not related to the European explorers, the listening challenges this and mentions that this coin is genuine historical evidence and was brought to the American site by the Norse.
First, the author states that there is a great distance between the American site and the Norse settlements in Canada. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and points out that the Native Americans used to bring objects from different sites and faraway places. The lecturer explains that Americans traveled great distances because they were interested to obtain other objects, so they might obtain this silver coin from a faraway place.
Second, the writer posits that no other coins were found in the same Canadian sites. On the contrary, the speaker refutes this and contends that the Norse came to America but they did not stay permanently, but they returned back to Europe. The lecturer says that when the Norse returned back to Europe, they backed up all their valuable items. The professor explains that they might bring coins, but they took them back with them to Europe.
Third, the reading claims that the Norse did not travel with their coins since Americans did not recognize them as money. Nevertheless, the listening contradicts this and states that Americans valued attractive and unusual objects. The lecturer says that these coins were beautiful, so Americans could appealed to their beauty. The speaker concludes that the Norse could use these coins to trade with Americans.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 72
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 37
- In today's world, it is important to work quickly and risk making mistakes rather than working slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should give the same amount of money to their students sports activities as they give to their univesity libraries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 64
- the societies rules that young people should follow are too strict 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returned'.
Suggestion: returned
...they did not stay permanently, but they returned back to Europe. The lecturer says that when ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returned'.
Suggestion: returned
.... The lecturer says that when the Norse returned back to Europe, they backed up all their val...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'appeal'
Suggestion: appeal
...oins were beautiful, so Americans could appealed to their beauty. The speaker concludes ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... these coins to trade with Americans.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09025270758 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40816143277 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494584837545 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4450328692 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.461538462 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450588800323 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168205449508 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936377063296 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278376016336 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891333320741 0.0443174109184 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.