Tpo 44
Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage.
European silver coin
The reading and the listening materials have a debate on being original the discovered silver coin at the main. The penman puts forward 3 main hypothesizes, which are refuted by the following orator.
First of all, the writer suggests that the coin is founded in far distance from Canada and this means that someone may misguide the scientists. On the contrary, the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to her, archaeologists have discovered many other objects rather than the coin in such a far distances and it may be because of Norse's interest for travelling.
The second point offered by the author is that only one coin is detected in this area and 1000 km distance between this coin and the Norse settlements in Canada reveals no relationship between them. On the other hand, the lecturer casts doubt on this assumption by saying that Norse were not permanent settlement and they may return the coins back to European with themselves again and again.
Last, the reading passage proposes that there was no logical or economical usage for Americans of a coin from a foreign country. However, the professor holds a different perspective. She explains that The Americans valued attractive and unusual objects. As a result, Europeans may trade with them by interesting and beautiful things.
In all, the ideas mentioned in the speech counter the opinions in the text in that the European silver coin could have a historical value according to above reasons.
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 73
- tpo39 3
- TPO 49humpback whales, stars navigation 78
- TPO 33 80
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66852912937 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607287449393 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.007581613 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426736460526 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131402758396 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908526854778 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209436317117 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492246795426 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.