TPO 45
In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that several reasons to criticize the possibility of that the chamber structures that found in Arizona are actually related to bee nest. While, in the listening, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and believes that it is completely possible that this structure was related to bee nest, and the reasons that mentioned in the passage is not convincing.
First of all, in the text, it is clearly mentioned that the scientists could not find any bee fossils that date to 200 million years ago. Thus, this structure cannot be related to bees. However, the professor claims that if we do not find bees fossils older than 200 million years ago, it does not mean that the bees were not present at this time. Because the bees fossils could produce and preserve if these insects trapped into the trees resin sticky substance and this kind of tree was very rare in 200 million years ago.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that the flowering plants did not exist 200 million years ago. And in the absence of flowering plants, the bees could not exist because they mainly feed on flowering plants. She says that it is possible that the bees present before flowering plants because a lot of early bees feed on non-flowering plants and also the fren and pontriis.
Finally, in the text, it is stated that there is a lack of evidence that can support that this structure is related to bees nest. because this structure is without the cap but the bees nest have it. The professor subscribes that the modern bees produced their nest using some waterproof materials and these materials are present in this structures. Therefore, it is possible that this chamber was related to bees nest.
- Do you agree or not?Because people are busy doing so many things, they do very few things well. 76
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well. 76
- For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. 90
- For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to su 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
...serve if these insects trapped into the trees resin sticky substance and this kind of...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...this structure is related to bees nest. because this structure is without the cap but t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ials and these materials are present in this structures. Therefore, it is possible t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79478827362 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39821275501 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456026058632 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6529153934 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.230769231 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0795985304784 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395719425112 0.0996497079465 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0159295371792 0.0662205650399 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0520364412512 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158198520738 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.