tpo 45 bees fossil
The material discusses if the nest that has been found in Arizona could resemble bees' nests. While the reading casts doubts that these structures were created by bees, the listening challenges this and points out that it is possible that these old fossilized structures were bees' nests, and all the claims that are stated by the reading passage are not convincing.
First, the author mentions that there is no preserved body of a bee returned back to two hundred million years ago, which means no bees existed during that time. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and brings up that the absence of a bee's fossil does not mean that there were no bees 200 million years ago. The lecturer explains that the bee's body could be preserved by using a specific sticky liquid formed by raisin trees. The speaker adds that these trees were rare 200 million years ago, but they started to be common latter. According to the lecture, the bees could be existed but could not be preserved because of the lack of raisin trees.
Second, the writer mentions that there were no flowering plants two hundred million years ago, and bees are usually depending on flowers to get their food and nectar. Thus, without flowering plants, bees could not exist. On the contrary, the professor encounters this and cites that bees a long time ago could feed on nonflowering plants, such as ferns or pine trees. The lecturer posits that after the appearance of flowering plants, bees might adapt to feed on them and has become a stable food for bees ever since.
Third, the reading says that the fossilized structures lack caps, which are common features in the modern bee nests. Conversely, the professor contradicts this and contends that the modern bee nests have a particular waterproof substance with a distinctive chemical structure to protect nests. The lecturer adds that by examining the fossilized nests, they found that they have the same chemical waterproof material, so these structures might be bee nests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Christine hanna | 52 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | mr3pac | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | mr3pac | 3 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | Christine hanna | 3 | view |
- do you agree or disagree, the government should spend more money on arts than on sports? 83
- Agree or disagree people today spend too much time one personal enjoyment doing things they like to rather than doing things they should do? 76
- tpo 38 Triassic mass-extinction 83
- the new regulations for handling and storge coal ash 70
- tpo 13 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returned'.
Suggestion: returned
...hat there is no preserved body of a bee returned back to two hundred million years ago, which...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bees'' or 'bee's'?
Suggestion: bees'; bee's
...his and brings up that the absence of a bees fossil does not mean that there were no...
^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...two hundred million years ago, and bees are usually depending on flowers to get their food and nectar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, second, so, third, thus, while, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 339.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91445427729 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36352594772 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483775811209 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7232920037 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0810122706883 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360118087165 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.017855804687 0.0662205650399 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0542872542278 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00637529301896 0.0443174109184 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.