tpo 47 pterosaurs could perform powered flight
The material discusses the ability of pterosaurs to fly. While the reading claims several arguments aganist their ability to perform powered flight, the listening challenges all these claims made by the writer and mention that pterosaurs were capable of powered flight.
First, the author states that pterosaurs were reptiles, so they were cold-blooded animal. Thus, they have a slow metabolsim and could not able to produce enough energy to make powered flight. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and points out that pterosaurs' fossils revealed that they had a dense hair like covering as warm-blooded animals. the lecturer adds that they could mentain their high body temperature when there were any extar condition, such as cold weather. The speaker explains that their metabolism will be as warm-blooded animals and faster than the reading suggestes. As a result, the professor concludes that they could produce enough energy to make powered flights.
Second, the writer mentions that petrosaurs were very large and heavy, so they could not fly. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this and contends that pterosaurs anatomically had hollow bones instead of solid. the professor mentions that despite their large body fram, they were weight low, so they could flap their wings and fly.
Third, the reading states that pterosaurs had weak back leg muscles that could not allow them to run fast and fly. Conversely, the lecturer contradicts this and posits that petrosaurs fly with different way than birds. the speaker explains that they could use their four limbs to walk and push to fly. The professor adds that even very large pterosaurs, there was no problem at all to use their four limbs to run fast enough and jump high enough to launch themselves into the air.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-08 | HSNDEK | 70 | view |
| 2020-05-30 | thichngaodu27 | 80 | view |
| 2020-05-29 | thichngaodu27 | view | |
| 2020-05-29 | thichngaodu27 | view | |
| 2019-11-04 | nagy | 81 | view |
- tpo 23 the declining of the yellow cedar trees 73
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? it is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study Science and Mathematics. used specific reasons and example to illustrate your idea 43
- tpo 20 the policy of let it burn and its effect on Yellowstone park 81
- Agree or disagree. Successful people try new things and take a risk rather than only doing what they already know how to do well? 73
- parents should spend their free time having fun with their kids in their free time or do something related to schoolwork 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... like covering as warm-blooded animals. the lecturer adds that they could mentain t...
^^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng suggestes. As a result, the professor concludes that they could produce enough...
^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ally had hollow bones instead of solid. the professor mentions that despite their l...
^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...terosaurs had weak back leg muscles that could not allow them to run fast and fly...
^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...aurs fly with different way than birds. the speaker explains that they could use th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, second, so, third, thus, while, such as, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1404109589 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42145084369 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506849315068 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0348378318 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.066666667 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407778844351 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133725997351 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680773211886 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244167060185 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420235989171 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.