TPO - 48
The lecturer and the reading passage hold completely different views toward the solution of the problem of declining frog populations.
The lecturer argues the first solution, prohibit use of pesticides, would not be economically practical solution. Farmers would have to face tremendous crop loss if they stop using pesticides that prevent their crop. Therefore, farmers would not be able to compete in the market and have to face severe disadvantages with the farmers of other areas. The reading passage, however, argues that the prohibition of use of harmful pesticides in sensitive frog population areas, would help intensively to reduce death of frogs.
Regarding the second solution, use of antifungal medication and heat treatments to kill fungus, the lecturer explains that these treatments must be applied individually to each from, which is a very extensive process and would not be that effective. Furthermore, these treatments do not pass on to another generations therefore each generation have to be treated every time. Hence, this is a complicated and expensive method. The reading passage gives the opposite view.
Finally, the lecturer objects the third measure, protection of key water habitats from excessive water usage and development. She points out that human activities are not the main cause of threatening of water habitats. These habitats are mainly threatened by the cause of global warming. Global warming is at very peak these days and causing disappearance of many water land habitats of frogs. This is in direct contradiction with the claim in the reading passage that human activities are removing the key water habitats of frogs.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge specific points made in the reading passage.Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of ver 80
- TPO-42 Integrated task 75
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task 78
- School teachers have found that this year more and more students copy homework from others, which one of the following choices is the best way to reduce this phenomenon?1. parents should supervise their children's study and homework and sigh their names t 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...these days and causing disappearance of many water land habitats of frogs. This is i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun water seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much water', 'a good deal of water'.
Suggestion: much water; a good deal of water
...these days and causing disappearance of many water land habitats of frogs. This is in dire...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40996168582 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8596957853 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55938697318 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6712149221 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.857142857 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356906050394 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101662717282 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659108237251 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176166588867 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565265507685 0.0443174109184 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.