tpo 48
In this set of materials, the reading section discusses the methods that can be applied to prevent the frogs from extinction, while the listening part casts doubt on what presented in the text by refusing the reasons mentioned in the article.
First of all, the lecture posits that if several laws prohibited farmers from pesticides, it would help to cut their negative effect on the frog’s population. In contrast, the professor underlines the fact that limiting pesticide on agricultural production does not benefit economically. In fact, she explains that since the farmers mostly rely on the pesticide to increase their crop yield, by forbidden pesticide in the area close to the frogs, the farmers easily lose the market, therefore they cannot gain reasonable profit in their affair.
Furthermore, the professor disagrees the methods for killing fungus which has fatally influence on the frog species, and implies that since this method is required to catch each frog individually to apply the medical drug on them, implementation in the large scale of the population is a complex task. Moreover, she highlights that because applying the medical treatment on one generation does not get rid of the rest of the generation from the fungal infection, this method does not seem as practical as the text indicates.
Finally, although the article states that if the water of frog’s inhabitant is protected of excessive use, they would survive, the instructor subscribes to the view that this way does not play a key role on their survival. Whereas global warming is the most important threaten for decreasing the water of wetlands which appears in recent decades.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-08 | PRACHI DAVE | 85 | view |
- TPO47 90
- Successful people try new thing and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well. Support your answer with details and examples. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- TPO 28 3
- tpo31 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, while, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22962962963 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.794664719 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.4931718771 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.5 110.228320801 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.75 21.698381199 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 7.06452816374 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340629717817 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130903711187 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764650647066 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183643750329 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469295475056 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.3589403974 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 53.8541721854 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.42419426049 124% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.