Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without any shadow of doubts, having interaction with others in the society is one one of the promenint needs and trends which are embedded in haman's spirit. A plothera of people are inclined towards the idea that by having ability of making new friends they can acquire more joyfulness, while others believe that the ability to caring of old ones provoke more energy and happiness in their life. I really subscribe this conviction that if people keep their buddies for a long time, they would be more happy. To support my stance, in the course of this essay, I will aptly substantiate my veiowpoints.
To begin with, having long lasting friendship with pals give sense of accomplishment, because the old frieds are more realiable than new ones. It is incontrovertibly axiomatic that life is repleted with ups and downs, which in both situations the existance of a old freind is more pronunce and will give the positive and unexamplified energy. For example, imagine a person who faces obstcles or dilemmas, what would be more worth than having a bunch of realiable freinds to convey a positive sense? No matter how many they are, it is crucial to have some freids who you can rely on them for ever, especially in difficult circumstances. It is crystal clear, a vast majority of people penchant to have freind because they want to be supported by them. Although by making new friend there will be more people around us, is it logicaly acceptable they would cause to be more happy? In some cases, new friends make a liithe bothering because of misunderstanding and having unplausible expectations.
Another reason which deserves to say some words here is that, peole cognize more their old frieds rather than new ones, even they have more in common with each others.They can spend their time in a same activity, or same tasks which would be effecient for them. Most of the long lasting friendships are usually initiated since school or collage, and lead them to make friens with a same insight, same goal, and is motivated them to care of their friendship. In this way, they can reach the zenith and provide more oppotunities of prospreouses. For example, I have had a friend simce I was in elementary school, the funny thing is that even after by paassaing this time, we studied to the Toefl togethe and we realy enjoyed of studing together. Because we know eachother for a long time, we not only could focus on our weakness, but also dcreased the level of our stress
In brief, contamplating all aforementioned reasons, one soon realises that the ability of preserving of friend in the long time not only brings more flourighing in the life, bu also give the sense of satisfacation.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. TPO41 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 28 3
- Successful people try new thing and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well. Support your answer with details and examples. 80
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Without any shadow of doubts, having int...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: one
...teraction with others in the society is one one of the promenint needs and trends which...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l aptly substantiate my veiowpoints. To begin with, having long lasting frien...
^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ich in both situations the existance of a old freind is more pronunce and will gi...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and having unplausible expectations. Another reason which deserves to say som...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...ey have more in common with each others.They can spend their time in a same activity...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also dcreased the level of our stress In brief, contamplating all aforeme...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, one soon realises that the ability of preserving of friend in the long time no...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, while, for example, in brief, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82937365011 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72682783358 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520518358531 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8466366281 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.75 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9375 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262319744858 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880262033077 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058421183434 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162576755827 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313499564554 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.