Both the article and the professor discuss the survival of frog species. The article proposed three methods to solve the problem of declining frog populations. However, the professor states that those methods is unconvincing and refutes the article.
First, the article suggests to prohibit farmer from using harmful pesticide, since those harmful pesticide would attack frog’s body and cause severe problems. However, the professor think this way is not fair or practical. Noting that many farmers rely on the pesticide to decrease loss and maintain the yield, stricter regulation of pesticide usage would cause the farmer to lose crop and decrease their production. Thus, this method is impractical.
In addition, because the fungus would thicken the frog’s skin and further cause dehydration, the reading propose claims that applying fungus treatment on a large scale would be beneficial. Nevertheless, the professor points out that we need to apply the treatment on each individual, plus the fact that the treatment would not prevent the fungus from passing to the offspring, thus this proposal seems too complicated and expensive.
Finally, the article states that if the critical habitats such as lake and marsh could be protected from human development, many frog species would recover. The professor is against this idea. She points out that the actually the global warming is the real threat of the frog, and would cause the entire declination of the population. Thus those protection of specific habitats would be unrealistic.
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 76
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO-45 Integrated Writing Task 3
- tpo 2 integrated writing 3
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests prohibiting'.
Suggestion: suggests prohibiting
...utes the article. First, the article suggests to prohibit farmer from using harmful pesticide, si...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the actually the'. Did you mean 'actually the'?
Suggestion: actually the
... against this idea. She points out that the actually the global warming is the real threat of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e entire declination of the population. Thus those protection of specific habitats w...
^^^^
Line 7, column 341, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this protection' or 'those protections'?
Suggestion: this protection; those protections
...ire declination of the population. Thus those protection of specific habitats would be unrealist...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecific habitats would be unrealistic.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47302904564 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71781381633 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560165975104 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.9901221443 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.461538462 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375805754806 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125656790941 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104806794376 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224535740941 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045668531633 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.