In this set of material, the passage and the lecture offer two opposing points of view about the population reduction of the frogs. While the passage argues that there is a method to be recruited in order to cease this reduction and provides three methods, the lecture states these solutions cannot be considered as practical solutions and there are problems with each of them.
First, the passage asserts if law hinders the farmer from using pesticides near sensitive frog population, it would be a big step toward preserving frog population. In contrast, the passage throws down this statement by illustrating the point that this exercise is not economically practical and fair to the farmers owing to the fact that it would lead to a lower yield in comparison to other competition.
Second, the article declares by treating frogs and removing the fungus out of their skins, we can help them to live longer. Due to the fact that they absorb water from their skin, if we remove the fungus out of their skin, they would be able to live longer and that demonstrate the fact that the reduction can be ceased by this treatment. On the other hand, the speaker refutes this statement by pointing out this method is not practical because it should apply to every individual frog and that does not guarantee the elimination of this problem due to the fact that frogs pass these disease to their offsprings.
Finally, the author claims that by preserving frogs habitats which are lakes and marshes, we can recover the frog species. In order to achieve this goal, we have to protect these lands from excessive water use and draining of wetlands by humans. In contradict, the speaker rejects this remark and states that although it is important to preserve lakes and wetlands, the major cause that affects these lands is global warming, not human activities; hence, this solution is not practical just like the other two.
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 75
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 78
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 80
- TPO-23 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons an 73
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this disease' or 'these diseases'?
Suggestion: this disease; these diseases
...problem due to the fact that frogs pass these disease to their offsprings. Finally, the auth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, if, second, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87423312883 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50412171051 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51226993865 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.4374883661 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.9 110.228320801 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6 21.698381199 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280659270148 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125397880622 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875821255578 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168107254188 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769862888583 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.3589403974 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 53.8541721854 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.