In the reading its states that frogs are in danger through different reasons so its states that different reason to avoid this threatening. But The lecturer contend the given solution by justiffing they cant eliminate the given solution couldn't eliminate the problem and incline the frog population.
First in the reading it is described as offering regulation to decrease pestisid use for farmers will reverse the process of declination of the frog. But this idea is challenged by the lecturer because decreasing the pestiside use will affect the economy. This solution will create even a great problem due to the farmers regularly uses to eliminate the insect which is they harm there corn and sugarcane.
Secondly in the article it states that, The fungus which is the world wide disease harms the skin of frog by hardning and loses permiability and absorbition of water though skin. Therefor, it stets that killing these fungus by heating them. However this idea is challenged by the professor. It is described as it needs a geate budget and also this treatment is complex due to its needed to be treat each organism and each new offspring to eliminate the disease.
Finally, in the article its expresed as because of enormuse water use the habitat of the frogs are in danger. The professor claims a doubt on this as, The usage of water use didn't cause the problem instade global warming did. And also its impossible to prevent people to use these water.
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 83
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 60
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...d the given solution by justiffing they cant eliminate the given solution couldnt el...
^^^^
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... they cant eliminate the given solution couldnt eliminate the problem and incline the f...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...it states that, The fungus which is the world wide disease harms the skin of frog by hardn...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...it states that, The fungus which is the world wide disease harms the skin of frog by hardn...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fungus' or 'these fungi', 'these funguses'?
Suggestion: this fungus; these fungi; these funguses
...h skin. Therefor, it stets that killing these fungus by heating them. However this idea is c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...t killing these fungus by heating them. However this idea is challenged by the professo...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...oubt on this as, The usage of water use didnt cause the problem instade global warmin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89516129032 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53194984769 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528225806452 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6230245551 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.166666667 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262801166536 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994711659619 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705026800517 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160462890684 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395835235297 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.