Both the reading passage and the listening talk about navigating systems of humpback whales using stars. The reading passage gives us three theories of humpback whales using stars to navigate. On the other hand, the listening refutes with the reading passage, telling us why.
First of all, the reading passage states that humpback whales can navigate using stars due to their high intelligence. On the contrary, the listening disagrees with the reading. The lecturer argues that there is no connection between stars and intelligence of humpback whales. The professor gives us an example of a duck to explain why. The professor mentioned that ducks have almost same intelligence as humpback whales but it never used for their navigation purposes. Therefore, the listening strongly states that there is no connection between stars and intelligence.
Moreover, the reading claims that humpback whales migrate in straight lines since they are orienting themselves by some external objects or forces like stars. However, the professor insists that it cannot be true and tells us why. The professor says that some external objects or forces that the reading passage mentioned is a magnetic field from earth, not stars. The lecturer mentions bio-magnetic to explain his statement. The lecturer says that bio-magnetic stored in humpback whales' brain helps them to sense the magnetic field from the earth and navigate their ways.
Finally, the reading passage argues that an unusual behavior like spy-hopping is a reason why humpback is using stars to navigate. The reading passage also mentioned that the whales were floating straight up for minutes, putting their heads above the water. On the other hand, the lecturer disagrees with the reading. The lecturer says that the spy-hopping very rare from humpback whales. The professor provides an example of sharks to support her statement. The lecturer said that sharks do spy-hopping but they never really migrate or look at stars. Also, the professor mentions that sharks do spy-hopping when only looking for prey to hunt. The professor also said that sharks do spy-hopping only at days, not at the night. Therefore, the lecturer thinks the reading passage's statement if a pure speculation.
In conclusion, the lecturer refutes the points made in the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...us an example of a duck to explain why. The professor mentioned that ducks have alm...
^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... bio-magnetic to explain his statement. The lecturer says that bio-magnetic stored ...
^^^
Line 7, column 460, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ple of sharks to support her statement. The lecturer said that sharks do spy-hoppin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, really, so, therefore, in conclusion, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1373.03311258 142% => OK
No of words: 366.0 270.72406181 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32786885246 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61586588671 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428961748634 0.540411800872 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 419.366225166 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 23.0 8.23620309051 279% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 13.0662251656 184% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3025406559 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.25 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.25 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316200383204 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966892327142 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816968075474 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165197156582 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846510778001 0.0443174109184 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.04 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.