The main idea of both the reading and the lecturer is about the mission to land on Mars. Although the reading presents some problems for this mission, the lecturer finds them unconvincing and provides three solutions to address the concerns stated by the author.
First of all, the reading states that since the distance of the Mars is farther than Moon, this trip would last about two years and providing food, water and oxygen for this amount of time is difficult due to the limited capacity of cargo. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that there is a technique to address this problem called " Hydroponic" which means growing plants by means of water instead of soil. In this method, the root of plants are floating in water, thus, cultivation of crops will make adequate amount of food supplies for missioners. Not only the water vapor from this technique can provide enough water to drink, the plants consume the carbon dioxide and release oxygen enough to breath.
Furthermore, the reading explains that the zero-gravity environment would cause serious body damage in these couple of years. However, the lecturer mentions some missions of going through zero-gravity space in the past decades which took many months without any sever injuries. He also mentions some techniques to manage the impact on human body. Missioners could not only do some regular exercise to help lower the rate of muscle reduction, but also they can take advantages of some vitamins and calcium to prevent the reduction of bone density as much as it is possible.
Eventually, the reading claims that not only astronauts cannot be protected from the high-level of space radiation from sun, but also the weight limitation of spaceship does not allow them to bring protected equipment. In contrast, the lecturer explains that this sun radiation happens every now and then during the peak of sun activity. In addition, not only can the spaceships be equipped by some monitoring and detecting equipment, but also there should be some small shelter which protect the missioner during harsh radiation detected by the devises without adding much weight to the cargo.
- For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 95
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 73
- Some people prefer to get up early in the morning and start the day’s work. Others prefer to get up later in the day and work until late at night. Which one do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 18-1 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onic' which means growing plants by means of water instead of soil. In this ...
^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g through zero-gravity space in the past decades which took many months without a...
^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...xplains that this sun radiation happens every now and then during the peak of sun activity. In add...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, thus, in addition, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 30.3222958057 178% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 356.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08988764045 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52576047489 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 145.348785872 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558988764045 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8236869408 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.384615385 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3846153846 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.