TPO 51
The reading discusses wonderful behaviors of elephants and the auther listed three ideas to support this issue. However, the professor finds all the ideas misunderstanding and presents some evidence to refute them.
First, the author points out that elephants are aware of appoaching death so they seperate their herds and go to the near of water alone. In contrast, the lecturer dismisses this idea and asserts that there is a practical reason for this behavior. When elephants become old their tooth become down and they need to softer vegetation. As a result, they go near the water to find the food, the soft vegetation grew souronding the water.
Furtheremore, the author mentioned that they have artistic ability to paint drawings. On the contrary, the speaker casts doubt on this issue by standing that as they are trained to paint, the stroke ears of them are so sensible and make them able to draw some patterns but they do not represent flowers or animals.
Finally, the reading passage proposes that elephants fear of mice because the recent research revealed when the mice went to their place they backed away and left the area to avoide them. On the other hand, in direct contradiction to the reading passage, the speaker claims that it is just a misintrepretation bacause mice is the animal that elephants are unfamilair with them. Thus, the natural intrinsic has caused they avoid mice. Thogh, in the zoo that there are mice and they know them, they do not feel to expose to threatening behavior. In conclusion, according to the listening materials, the argumant that elephants have surprising behaviors are unwarrented.
- TPO 50 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 52 integrated writing 7
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 76
- TPO 24 integrated writing 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, so, thus, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03676470588 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68505964684 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9509375044 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.384615385 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.