TPO 52- integrated writing task
The author states a few reasons of why would be the best to send people to an asteroid. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these reasons do not seem convincing.
First and foremost the writer mentions that since the asteroids are smaller than planets, they have low gravity, so this makes the landing safer. Also, it will allow a spacecraft to carry much more equipment needed to set up the colony. On the contrary, the professor cannot disagree more, reasoning that it is true that the low gravity makes the landing easier, but it also, cause health problems for the people who are there. Some problems are loses of muscle mass, and bone density.So, people could deal with health issues.
The second argument the author gives is that the asteroids are rich in valuable elements such as gold and platinum. So, people could bring these metals on Earth. As a result, the metals could be sold and they can profit from them. However, the lecturer cannot be more outraged, explaining that the cost of these metals and the transportation would cost more than they think because it may happened that the price of these metals would not be the same as the real value is. The market would decide what are the values of these metals. Nobody could predict that.
Lastly, on one hand, the reading passage points out that asteroids are easy to reach, some of them come too close to Earth. So, would be much more affordable to get to and return back to Earth again. Nevertheless, the professor declare that it is true that it is easy to reach an asteroid, but to return back to Earth could take even longer because the orbital pathways that the spacecraft would follow could be shifted. That's why, it is very challenging to take the risk to go to an asteroid.
- The author states about he reasons of sending people to an asteroid to form a colonization is the best option. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.First and foremost 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO 49 50
- TPO 39- Integrated Writing Task 3
- Should people learn the foreign language by going to the country that speaks the language? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
... loses of muscle mass, and bone density.So, people could deal with health issues. ...
^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...d be much more affordable to get to and return back to Earth again. Nevertheless, the profe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 298, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...it is easy to reach an asteroid, but to return back to Earth could take even longer because...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 422, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...acecraft would follow could be shifted. Thats why, it is very challenging to take the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, may, nevertheless, second, so, such as, as a result, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66981132075 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33105425321 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531446540881 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3995672859 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8125 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.