TPO-52. Integrated Writing Task. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading passage and the lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not living in Asteroids will be the best choose rather than Moon or planets like Mars. The article strongly postulates that conquering Asteroids have a plenty of upsides. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that colonize this kind of space object is extremely risky and have a large number of downsides.
First of all, according to the reading, landing an Asteroids will be much more immunity due to the lower gravity and it is the way to carry more equipment. However, the lecturer disputes this point. He says that lower gravity presents risk such as people will losing muscle mass and end up with health problem.
Secondly, the reading states that Asteroids have a treasured elements and estimable metal. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. He argues that returning back this kind of rare elements will be more expensive and its cost will drop as soon as landing on the Earth.
Finally, the reading claims that Asteroids are effortless to reach due to the fact that occasionally they are closer than Moon. On the other hand, the lecturer believe that it will be complicated return. Yet, Asteroids move away and its distance becoming far away than planets like Mars.
In a nutshell, although the reading and the lecture both about Asteroids, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 85
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO-52. Integrated Writing Task. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 83
- TPO 54- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 76
- TPO-50 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not living in Asteroids will be the best ch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...pace object is extremely risky and have a large number of downsides. First of all, according to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an asteroid' or simply 'Asteroids'?
Suggestion: an asteroid; Asteroids
... all, according to the reading, landing an Asteroids will be much more immunity due to the l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 260, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...avity presents risk such as people will losing muscle mass and end up with health prob...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returning'.
Suggestion: returning
...r refutes this argument. He argues that returning back this kind of rare elements will be more...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, kind of, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0460251046 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55726248041 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573221757322 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5645077616 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7692307692 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111891653146 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424236561714 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591097451426 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766265936448 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724127671918 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.