TPO 52 task 1
The reading and the lecture both discuss whether colonizing asteroids is the best options for human or not. While the text alleges that asteroids are the best option for people to colonize than moon or mars, the talk refutes the claims proposed in the passage, believing that it is not a practical way and has several downsides.
To begin with, although low gravity makes landing on the surface easier for people, colonizing on asteroids have health risks for people. Indeed, people who were in space for a long time suffer from muscle and bone low density. As a result, the author's idea about low gravity of asteroids is rejected.
Furthermore, while mining raw and valuable metals from asteroids are a profitable idea, it has two factors that we should consider. First, the costs of supporting a colony and transferring equipment are so high that it cannot be convincible. Second, selling materials which are transferred from asteroids to the Earth will increase the supplying these elements on the Earth. Therefore the price of materials on the market will be decreased. In this line of thought, the writer's point of view about mining metals would be profitable is contradicted.
Finally, reaching asteroids may be easy for people, but getting back from asteroids would be challenging because asteroids come close to the Earth in some points, but they are moving away from The Earth so that it is not easy to return back from them. Accordingly, the article's opinion about asteroids' accessibility is wrong.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-15 | elaheh eskandari | 71 | view |
| 2020-07-21 | erfan717 | 71 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 73
- TPO 52 task 1 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... and bone low density. As a result, the authors idea about low gravity of asteroids is ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... supplying these elements on the Earth. Therefore the price of materials on the market wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...rom The Earth so that it is not easy to return back from them. Accordingly, the articles op...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'articles'' or 'article's'?
Suggestion: articles'; article's
...return back from them. Accordingly, the articles opinion about asteroids accessibility i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, finally, first, furthermore, may, second, so, therefore, while, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06772908367 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66151560932 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581673306773 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0265087632 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501873783554 0.272083759551 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154133693962 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946355775608 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27645297645 0.162205337803 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901879526075 0.0443174109184 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.