tpo 53Integrated task
both the reading and the listening materials discuss the policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy foods. With this in mind, the author states that there are several social advantages in this idea. The lecturer, on the othe hand, refutes all three episodes of arguments mentioned in the passage and believing all the reasons are challengeable.
First of all, while the writer states that this idea is great for people health because discourage them from unhealthy behavior, the professor refutes this claim, believing that, it can even worse people's health condition. She continues that, in this way, people move to buy cheaper and low qualified cigarettes which are more harmfull for their health.
Second, the reading selection points out that this idea is fair because those people who smoking or eating unhealthy foods make more medical costs. Hence, they should pay more taxes. However, the speaker makes it clear that this idea is not fair in essenss because both the smaller income and high earn income who are adict to smoking should pay equally. As a result, the situation will be worse just for low income people.
Finally, the author holds the view that this idea could benefited not only somker ones but also nonsomker people because government can uses this extra revenue into public welfare. Conversely, the professor explains that in this fashion, the govenrment try to keep this extra revenue and avoid to lose it. Therefore, they will try to change some rules for instance allowing people to smok in public and non public places to prevent losing the income.
- tpo 24 76
- TPO-48 76
- many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or gone extinct due to changes in their environment. 3
- In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States, birds in particulare. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely t 80
- TPO 46 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
both the reading and the listening materials...
^^^^
Line 13, column 311, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...the smaller income and high earn income who are adict to smoking should pay equally. As...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... worse just for low income people. Finally, the author holds the view that...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 58, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...hor holds the view that this idea could benefited not only somker ones but also nonsomker...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 138, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...nonsomker people because government can uses this extra revenue into public welfare....
^^^^
Line 21, column 290, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid losing'.
Suggestion: avoid losing
...ment try to keep this extra revenue and avoid to lose it. Therefore, they will try to change ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13257575758 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29863703278 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594696969697 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3295257121 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.916666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.