TPO 54
The reading and the lecture are both commenting on options for reducing salinity of the Salton Sea. The author provides three solutions for the problem. The lecturer, however, finds them dubious and casts doubt on the solutions proposed by the reading passage.
According to the reading, the salinity of the sea can be decreased by direct removal of salt. Conversely, this specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that the solid materials left behind from evaporation of sea water can cause other harmful pollutions in the region. Additionally, she points out that the remains of evaporation can produce selenium that is a great harmful element for humans and other creatures.
Further, the reading passage holds the view that adding water from the Pacific Ocean can help to dilute the salt in the Salton Sea. On the contrary, the lecturer asserts that the government does not have enough resources for digging tunnels and channels from the ocean to the area. Additionally, she points out that the distance between the lake and the ocean is too far and demands a lot of money to make facilities.
Finally, the author posits that building walls and dividing the lake to separate sections can help reducing salinity. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is that the location of the lake is geologically active and strong earthquakes happen frequently. She notes that with the first strong earthquakes walls are fell down and the salty waters leak to other sections and make them salty again.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-24 | YasamanEsml | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | YasamanEsml | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture are both com...
^^^
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ovides three solutions for the problem. The lecturer, however, finds them dubious a...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions proposed by the reading passage. According to the reading, the salinity o...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lement for humans and other creatures. Further, the reading passage holds the v...
^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...distance between the lake and the ocean is too far and demands a lot of money to m...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nds a lot of money to make facilities. Finally, the author posits that building...
^^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
... the lake to separate sections can help reducing salinity. In contrast, the lecturers st...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...elp reducing salinity. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that the location of the lake...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06827309237 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57628565697 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538152610442 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0398624216 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.0769230769 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266695908882 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818445062143 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054238373682 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141525032837 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562287548512 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.