TPO 7
The reading and the lecture are both about an international certification that wood companies can get if they meet high ecological standards. The reading states that this certification cannot be useful for American companies and provides three reasons to support this idea. However, the lecturer disagrees with the reading and rejects all of the three reasons that are mentioned in the reading.
First, according to the reading American people do not pay attention to advertises, because there are many of those labels that are not true like labels that say the product is new or improved. In contrast, the lecturer believes that people do not treat all Ads in the same way and they can distinguish the difference between a claim that a company may do and a certification that a company got from an independent organization.
Next, the reading declares that companies which get those certifications will add the costs to the price of their products. As price is an important motivation factor for American people, the demand the good will decrease. The lecturer refutes this claim and points out that if the price difference be less than 5% people do not care about it and pay more attention to the value of environment protection.
Finally, the reading mentions that American companies do not export their products, so this certification is not useful for them. On the contrary, the lecturer explains that although American wood companies sell their products to domestic consumers, they have many foreign competitors which have that certification and can attract American buyers to themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-28 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 75 | view |
| 2021-11-22 | shayanhgh | 70 | view |
| 2021-11-18 | NGN | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-18 | ehsanghoflsaz | 3 | view |
| 2021-10-14 | cluelessme | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... disagrees with the reading and rejects all of the three reasons that are mentioned in the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, so, in contrast, on the contrary, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20077220077 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87877649259 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509652509653 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8624029026 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.7 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.