TPO 8 the Chevalier s memoir accuracy
The reading specifies that accuracy of memoir writtend by the Chevalier is skeptical since plenty critics claims he distorts many events to make his life more exciting. Nevertheless, the professor casts dount on it and believe that the memoir are pretty accurate and reliable source.
First, the reading states that the Chevalier was not wealthy because borrowed considerable sums of money from a Swiss merchant. However, the speaker states that the Chevalier who borrowed a great deal of money, was not poor. He has a lot of assets which solds and uses its money for parties and gambling. Therefore, the Chevalier was forced to borrow money since he was waiting for his money to arrive.
Second, according to the lecture, the Chevalier completed his memoir after many years that meets Voltairs. Hence, it is not possible to remember all the conversation accurately. In contrast, the lecturer explains that the Chevalier after meeting the Voltaire wrote what he remembered about their conversation each night.
Third, based on the passage, the Chaevalier did not escape from ceiling. He had a number of politically well-conected friend who offered bribes to jailer to let him escape. On the contrary, the speaker assests that many other prisons have more powerful friends than the Chevalier but they could not escape the prison by bribing. Also, the ceiling of the Chevalier was repaired after his escape and because of that we can accept the fact that he escapes from ceiling.
- tpo 33 81
- tpo21 80
- Integrated tpo8 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, well, as for, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09465020576 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58343145938 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2238199098 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2307692308 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207147126446 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693682800039 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648322726826 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129186748568 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06777975562 0.0443174109184 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.