The author states that the all events in a long and invaluable memoir, written by Chevailer, are not accurate and presents three reasons for the statement. On the other hand, professor has the opposite viewpoint and rebuts all these reasons, believing that the memoir is accurate according to reliable historical records.
First of all, the article claims that Chevalier was not wealthy since he borrowed hefty amount of money from a Swiss merchant. The lecture debunks this perspective by saying that borrowing money does not mean that Chevailer was poor. When he travelled to Switzerland, in order to do gambling and being in parties, he wanted significant amount of money. He had a considerable amount of assets but to convert them to money he was forced to borrow money from a merchant until his money transferred to him from overseas. Therefore, borrowing money does not represent that Chevalier was poor.
Secondly, according to the text, it is almost impossible to record all the conversations which were happened hundreds of years before the time when Chevalier wrote memoir. This claim was also incorrect as Chevalier had recorded all the conversations between himself and well-known writer Voltaire. Each night, Chevalier wrote down all of his conversations in a personal notebook.
Finally, the author mentions that Chevalier was not actually escaped from the notorious prison in Venice and he indeed exaggerate about his escape and instead he bribed the officers to escape from the prison. This is also refused by the professor, pointing out that according to the historical records, there were much more influential and powerful people in those time who would be able to get themselves free from the prison by offering money to the officers. Nevertheless, none of them were successful of escaping from the prison. Moreover, after Chevalier escaped, there were reported that authorities repaired the ceiling of the prison. If Chevalier were not impaired the ceiling, there was not required to repair it just the day after he freed himself.
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 70
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 73
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 71
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 71
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels health and fitness is decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'exaggerates'.
Suggestion: exaggerates
...otorious prison in Venice and he indeed exaggerate about his escape and instead he bribed ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 332.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2078313253 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74477260861 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548192771084 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0480036971 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.266666667 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.