tpo integraded 17
Both reading and lecture are talking about how bird population got affected by human population. The reading says that increased human population decreased bird population. In contrary, the lecture disagrees. It says that the reasons stated in the reading are unconvincing.
First, the reading states that as human population and settlement continue to expand, bird's natural habitats continue to disappear. For example, people use forests, wetlands and grasslands to build homes, malls and offices. As a result, the areas suitable for birds living are decreasing. Yet, the lecturer doesn't agree. She says that urban life has bad impact on some types of birds, but it also has a good one on other types. For example, now we can easily see pigeons on streets of cities, and seagulls as well. Number of hooks and folks are increased as they feed on died pigeons and rodents.
Second, the reading says that birds’ population in rural areas continue to decrease as wilderness areas are converted to agricultural use. For further illustration, as human population increase, more crops are needed. As a result more agricultural areas are needed and more wilderness areas are used for this purpose. However, the lecture disagrees. It states that now less agricultural land are used. New techniques are introduced to increase the crop production per unit land. No need to destroy the original habitats (wilderness areas) of the birds.
Third, the reading claims that pesticides have a negative effect on birds’ population. As it is explained, pesticides go indirectly into water and food chain of birds. Sometimes birds can die from eating poisoned insect or drinking contaminated water. Other times birds lose the reproduction capabilities as a result of being in contact directly or indirectly with pesticides. On the other hand, the lecture opposes this. It states that people are aware of the possible consequences of pesticides. They developed two new techniques to overcome this issue. First, using new less toxic pesticides. Second, using more pest resistance crops which are not attracting to pests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
- TPO INTEGRATED 26 73
- In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 66
- Parents today are more involved in their children s education than were parents in the past 70
- The extended family(grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 70
- advertising tell people about the country 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...iving are decreasing. Yet, the lecturer doesnt agree. She says that urban life has bad...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'habitats'' or 'habitat's'?
Suggestion: habitats'; habitat's
...t land. No need to destroy the original habitats wilderness areas of the birds. Third...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, for example, talking about, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 335.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30447761194 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82717298839 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540298507463 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 13.0662251656 207% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3456521271 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.8148148148 110.228320801 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.4074074074 21.698381199 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06452816374 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434312462865 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103895833991 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956611065354 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251874122497 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526337279952 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.57 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.