tpo integrated 13
The lecture and the reading both discuss buying and selling fossil to private company. The reading states that buying and selling fossil collector unfortunate development for both scientist and general public. The lecture refutes this point saying that is not true and the author of the reading exaggerated.
First of all, the reading claims that publics have been suffering from buying and selling fossils to private companies. It becomes hard for the publics to see the fossils, which lead to decline in publics’ interest in fossil. The lecture argues that on the other hand, fossils become more available to the community. Furthermore, the professor states that many schools and libraries are now able to buy fossils from the collectors and display them to public.
In addition, the reading makes an argument that scientists lose access to some of the most important fossils. For example, wealthy fossil buyers want to obtain the rarest fossils. The lecture counters this point by stating that it is not realistic that scientist do not have access to the most important fossils. According to the professor the only people that can identify and examine the fossils are the scientists. The fossils must pass by the hand of scientists before any one else so scientist would not miss out any important things.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that private companies destroy the valuable scientific evidence associated to the fossils they unearth. For example, private companies pay no attention to how fossils lie in the ground or to the smallest fossils surround the bigger one. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing that many will not fossils will not be discovered, if private companies would not do that. Moreover, the professor says that it is better to have many discovered fossils with less scientific information than having less fossils with more scientific information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
- Many teachers assign homework to students every day. Do you think that daily homework is necessary for students? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 60
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your community. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory? Explain your position. 70
- tpo integrated 30 73
- tp integrated 30 3
- TPO INTEGRATED 42 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nate development for both scientist and general public. The lecture refutes this point saying ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... for both scientist and general public. The lecture refutes this point saying that ...
^^^
Line 6, column 474, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...t pass by the hand of scientists before any one else so scientist would not miss out an...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 531, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun fossils is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...less scientific information than having less fossils with more scientific informatio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, so, for example, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25245901639 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58087981265 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498360655738 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.0480476079 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.125 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.560093339475 0.272083759551 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206123592199 0.0996497079465 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089726859094 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351233084609 0.162205337803 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508585223563 0.0443174109184 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.