TPO1 integrated writing
The main topic of both the reading and the lecture is about four days work in a week with paying less money rather than five days work in a week. The writer provides benefits of this idea, however, the lecturer refutes each of them.
First of all, the author suggests that followers of this privilege have more time to rest, due to their mistake in the company and their costly error decrease. In contrast, the professor states that this way forces the company because of need much more worker that require training course, official space, and extra equipment such as a computer.
Secondly, the writer says according to this option the number of unemployed reduce. Nevertheless, lecturer's opinion is that it falls down the unemployed rate, but the worker follows the works that are easy to get and increase the expectation.
Finally, the passage mentions that this idea causes employers to have more time with their family to enjoy and leisure. While the speaker rebuts them by saying, more free time causes the low quality of life, lose the job, and tire work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-15 | sherry9797a | 70 | view |
| 2019-06-22 | Ba.M | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'worker' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: worker
...forces the company because of need much more worker that require training course, official ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 1373.03311258 64% => OK
No of words: 183.0 270.72406181 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81967213115 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26241387191 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1355295111 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.875 7.06452816374 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.