The reading and the lecture are both about the "portrait of a teenage girl." The author of the reading passage feels that painting must be of Jane Austen. He supports his argument by giving three possible reasons. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made by the author. He thinks that, in fact, the reasons given by the author are not convincing.
First of all, the author argues that the painting was of Jane Austen because her family gave permission to use her portrait in her letters. This specific point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that her family was not able to recognize her accurately, because they died about 70 years before the painting was made.
Secondly, the author contends that the painting must be of Jane Austen because the face of the painting resembles with the sketch of Cassandra. Since Cassandra made several sketches of Jane Austen, so it must be her portrait. This point is rebutted by the lecturer. He points out that the family of Jane Austen was large and there were many teenagers at the same time, so painting must be of other relatives of Jane Austen.
Finally, the author posits that the painting must be of Jane Austen because there was evidence that shows, the painting was created by the Ozis Humphrey. Austen Family was wealthy so that they hire Ozis Humphrey to sketch painting of Jane Austen, because of his distinctive style. In contrast, the speaker's opinion is that the material used in the painting was started to sell in Europe only after when Jane Austen was 27 years old. Hence, the painting must be of other people rather than Jane Austen
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO 29Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska s North Slope a region that today experiences an extremely cold arctic climate One hundred million years ago when those dinosaurs were alive the environment of the Nort 68
- TPO50 Integrated task 3
- TPO18 integrated 73
- Rembrandt s painting 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
...his distinctive style. In contrast, the speakers opinion is that the material used in th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76071428571 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36711904031 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471428571429 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8330164754 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8666666667 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477825516919 0.272083759551 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185170804514 0.0996497079465 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141052666966 0.0662205650399 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314662322171 0.162205337803 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105445170223 0.0443174109184 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.