TPO18
The author discusses some alternatives which have been proposed by some experts through which the Torreya taxifoha survives. However, the lecturer refutes those schemes since she thinks none of them are practical solutions for this matter.
First, some researchers suggest reestablishing the given tree in the same location because the area has specific and desirable microclimate which is appropriate to/for this kind of tree. Nonetheless, the professor believes that this approach is not helpful because global warming has a great impact on different climates and almost all regions are in danger, even cooler areas.
Second, another proposed approach is changing its location to a diverse condition, but the lecturer points the similar experiences about another tree which was relocated and had some harmful influences on other plants. According to the previous observation, moving a plant or tree to a new area may lead to some unpredictable consequences like disappearing other plants. This translates into that although it probably helps the tree, it may put some fragile plants in danger.
Finally, there is the third option in which the tree can be protected in a particular area, especially a research center which the conditions are under control not only to preserve the tree but also to conduct research on the tree. However, the professor mentions that there are three types of Torreya taxifoha in its population. Therefore, it is worth mentioning that an enough space is needed to locate various kinds of the given tree. Thus the last way is not a good choice as well.
- People access to different sources of news. Is it good? 90
- TPO35 3
- You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or club Do you agree or disagree that a person s honesty is the most important thing to consider in deciding whom to vote for Use reasons and examples to support your position 95
- Archaeology study probelm 3
- TPO22-teachers should not make their political and social point of views known to students 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 439, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...locate various kinds of the given tree. Thus the last way is not a good choice as we...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, third, thus, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25098039216 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75694920792 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619607843137 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6397669489 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.727272727 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264415286398 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909504597607 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656429699939 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151033670537 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498037030143 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.