some possible problems associated with using a turtle excluder device (TED)
The author points out some possible problems associated with using a turtle excluder device (TED) to indicate that some other solution should be considered. The lecturer, however, refutes the aforementioned arguments and offers some counterclaims to support the merits of TED.
First, according to the reading, turtles rarely placed in traps, one per month. In addition, TED is not economical in terms of its price since shrimpers have to pay so much in comparison to the small chance of protecting a turtle. Nevertheless, the professor concedes the statement that the event occurs hardly ever, but if it is considered that throughout different parts of the USA these shrimpers are working almost everyday, it can be concluded that they pose a serious hazard to thousands of turtles.
Second, there are some other possibilities which can be substitute with using TED such as reducing the time when shrimpers are allowed keeping their net underwater. On the contrary, the speaker rejects the claim due to the fact that it seems just a theoretical method. He rule out the possibility of monitoring time by the individuals, but TED provides them a more reliable and easy approach to reinforce the shrimpers to let turtle escape.
Third, the existing TED is not designed properly and efficiently since the openings are not big enough. Conversely, the professor alludes to other points that these TEDs are specially designed in order to be utilized in some specific areas, and they possess their application in a given region. Hence, it is feasible to produce other TEDs with distinct features based on different conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-23 | farzaddanaeii | 85 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | haoboooo | 70 | view |
| 2018-09-23 | Springlovers | 75 | view |
| 2018-09-02 | nastaran1992 | 73 | view |
| 2017-07-27 | meysamkh | 83 | view |
- some possible problems associated with using a turtle excluder device (TED) 83
- one who cannot accept others' criticism becomes successful in group 90
- whether or not children should be allowed doing whatever they want 90
- TPO22-teachers should not make their political and social point of views known to students 86
- TPO35 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'occurs'.
Suggestion: hardly occurs
...r concedes the statement that the event occurs hardly ever, but if it is considered that thro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... USA these shrimpers are working almost everyday, it can be concluded that they pose a s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'rules'.
Suggestion: rules
... it seems just a theoretical method. He rule out the possibility of monitoring time ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, in addition, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19391634981 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85638147329 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61216730038 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.799480338 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.181818182 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383563889799 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127370184653 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168349417501 0.0662205650399 254% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232689240666 0.162205337803 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19053643595 0.0443174109184 430% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.