tpo22
both the author and the lecturer discuss reasons causes declining yellow cedar population. The passage claims that there are some hypotheses explain this decline. The professor on the other hand, reject whatever mentioned in the reading through citing three reasons.
First, both the author and the professor talk about insects attack on yellow cedar. According to the passage insect parasites, especially the cedar bark beetle is one major reason of reducing yellow cedar's population. The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects the author's view and illustrate the idea that yellow cedar is resistant tree whose bark and leaves secret chemical poisons against insects. Thus, beetle can hurt trees that is already damaged, so insect cannot be the fundamental reason for diminishing of yellow cedar’s population.
Second of all, both the reading and the lecture discuss brown beer's influence on yellow cedar's population. The author argues that beers sometimes claw at the cedars in order to eat the tree bark, which contain a high sugar content, therefore beer's aggressive feeding habits may cause decline in yellow cedar’s population. However, the professor refutes this, saying that in islands, where there is not brown beer, decline of population is seen, so beer cannot responsible for reducing yellow cedar’s population.
eventually, the passage and the lecture address the subject of climate change. The passage goes on to mention that root freezing leads to the tree damage and eventually kill it. In contrast, the professor points out that in areas with low elevation that is warm, this reducing in number of trees is conspicuous, so root frost cannot cause decline in yellow cedar’s population.
All in all, the author maintains that there are several reason discuss reduction in yellow cedar’s population, while the professor not only completely cast doubt on it, but he also demonstrates that these reasons cannot proof decrease in the tree’s population.
- If the government wants to invest in the following three areas, what do you think is the most worthwhile? land exploration, education, and healthcare. 3
- Tpo 26 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parent’s job than to choose jobs that are different from their parent’s job. Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 76
- TPO 31 Sinosauropteryx 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
both the author and the lecturer discuss rea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cedars'' or 'cedar's'?
Suggestion: cedars'; cedar's
... is one major reason of reducing yellow cedars population. The lecturer, nevertheless,...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cedars'' or 'cedar's'?
Suggestion: cedars'; cedar's
...discuss brown beers influence on yellow cedars population. The author argues that beer...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Eventually
...ng yellow cedar's population. eventually, the passage and the lecture address th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 49, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
...ll, the author maintains that there are several reason discuss reduction in yellow cedar'...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53745928339 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7025389452 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540716612378 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7454207963 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.428571429 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0324900780604 0.272083759551 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0150941388682 0.0996497079465 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0149178977672 0.0662205650399 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0210780980118 0.162205337803 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00784291568792 0.0443174109184 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.