TPO23 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage

Essay topics:

TPO23- Question : Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.

In the reading passage, the author claims that are three possible explanations for the decline of yellow cedar. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented and states some evidence to the contrary.

To begin with, the writing suggests that the decrease of the yellow cedar can be caused by insect parasites, such as bark beetle. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture. He rejects this by mentioning that health cedars are very resistant to parasites. As a result, the professor feels that this cause is not a fundamental cause.

Secondly, the author believes that a possible explanation for the decline of cedar's trees are attributed to brown bears. In the other hand, the lecture explains that this idea does not justify the decline of these trees in some areas that do not bears, such as in the island. Therefore, he thinks that this concept is faulty.

Finally, the author posits that a change's climate might be capable to frozen the yellow cedar's root, killing it. But, this idea is rebutted by the professor. He argues that the decline of the cedars occur more in warm and lower areas than in cold and high areas. Hence, the professor believes that the frozen root is not a possible cause for this problem.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-26 kamyab6969 3 view
2022-10-07 zmz 70 view
2022-05-02 marygh 70 view
2022-01-12 Shaya 70 view
2021-01-10 farifari 56 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user eeemmmyyy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'bear'?
Suggestion: bear
...f these trees in some areas that do not bears, such as in the island. Therefore, he t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'changes'' or 'change's'?
Suggestion: changes'; change's
...y. Finally, the author posits that a changes climate might be capable to frozen the ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, such as, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48700756162 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540909090909 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8898520368 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9230769231 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315658858205 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110199816881 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665049739133 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188406554877 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646648558856 0.0443174109184 146% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.