TPO25 integrated writing
The reading and listening materials have a conflict about whether the vessels were ancient batteries. The writer believes that these vessels should by no means be identified as batteries, which is contradicted by the following lecture.
For starters, the author claims that there is not any metal wires found nearby while the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. That is, the vessels were discovered by local people, not by archaeologists. In this situation, it is highly likely that these untrained local residents did not recognize metal wires and conductors. So, they may overlooked them and threw them away.
In addition, the passage argues that these vessels may be used to hold scrolls due to the resemblance of copper cylinders in Seleucia. However, the professor opposes this argument by saying that this copper cylinders in the vessels may be used for holding scrolls at first, yet it could also serve another purpose later. Actually, it is the case that when the copper cylinders are filled with some liquid and iron rods, they can create electricity. Therefore, the first battery is born through such process.
Finally, the writer views that batteries were useless for ancient people. By contrast, in accordance with the professor, this statement does not hold water. Because the batteries can produce mild shock and tingling sensation, （so）ancient people might take advantage of this invisible power to make others believe that they have magic power. Also, nowadays, doctors use electric current from batteries to stimulate muscle, reducing pains. Therefore, chances are high that ancient people used it for the same sake.
- TPO44-W1 76
- 42 integrated writing 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement Governments have done enough to educate the people the importance of a balanced lifestyle and healthy eating 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful leaders should make others part of the decision making process 85
- TPO30 integrated writing 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31178707224 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60108841016 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619771863118 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8947701084 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1333333333 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407015959038 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119374494591 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643237055525 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217061570654 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500968051516 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.