tpo30-indepandant
In the modern era career and its hours is one of the hated issues among governments and people. In fact, people requests modifying the work hour's condition to be proper with the employees’ condition. while, among employees, some group prefers to work five days with short time, other’s preference is few days’ works with long hours. I am in favor of the condition of a work that advocates three days with long hours of work due to some points like, having enough time for hobbies, completing works and high performance, spending time with family.
Initially, in the advancement societies, hobbies are known as a significant part of every person’s personality and his life. In the other words, hobbies raise the rate of creativity and happiness and undeniably these abilities advocate a person to be prosperous in the life and work. However, groups refer to benefit of long day’s work but short long time’ s work can be more beneficiary due to its positive effects on both life and work. For example, my friend who works at the office for three days can spend time on his hobbies and everything that supports him to improve his abilities and skills. Therefore, three days’ work with long hours seems logical to accept than five days for a long time.
As a second point, tasks that are completed in one day refine the rate of the company’s profits. Because long time or complete day work presents plenty of time to employees for their tasks. while in the short time terminate the work without achieving goal create disrupt between works. Plus, employee’">employee’s attention will be diminishing. A full day of work supports workers to have high attention and best performance. For example, five months ago the office where I am working there decided to test the employee’">employee’s performance between two group with two kinds of working hours, three days’ work with long hours and five days’ work with the short time that the outcomes proved the more performance among the first group. As a result, working hours let to employees complete the tasks in one day of work and its effect on worker’s performance id undeniable.
Finally, everybody is familiar with the family’s importance in life and its role in prosperity. works with fewer working days create a good chance to spend more time with family. The result of researches depicts that persons who have more time with their family, are optimistic about life and it can improve the rate of being successful in the working field. In the other words, being sanguine cause to positive energy which leads the employee to doing tasks accurately. For instance, some companies in Japan are using this method which reduce the working days in a week but the hours are long, reports illustrate that the performance of happiness employees is appropriate and consistent of company’s expectations.
Consequently, I agree with the statement which mentions three days’ work with long hours base on three reasons that supports my opinion like more time to entertainment, completed job and suitable operation and more time for family.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | zizi.dream | 3 | view |
- Tpo 45 3
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- tpo 47 76
- TPO32-integrated 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the modern era career and its hours i...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...per with the employees' condition. while, among employees, some group prefers to...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rformance, spending time with family. Initially, in the advancement societies,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... accept than five days for a long time. As a second point, tasks that are c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...y of time to employees for their tasks. while in the short time terminate the work wi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y of time to employees for their tasks. while in the short time terminate the work wi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ker's performance id undeniable. Finally, everybody is familiar with the ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Works
...nce in life and its role in prosperity. works with fewer working days create a good c...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stent of company's expectations. Consequently, I agree with the statement...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 7.30242825607 288% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 30.3222958057 251% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 5.01324503311 339% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2669.0 1373.03311258 194% => OK
No of words: 515.0 270.72406181 190% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18252427184 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.04702891845 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43396617173 2.5805825403 133% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 145.348785872 163% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460194174757 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 804.6 419.366225166 192% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8996682746 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.318181818 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4090909091 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68181818182 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 4.33554083885 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0820883563619 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372707779103 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283130329969 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688258481112 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152772129804 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 63.6247240618 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.