tpo32
Both the reading and lecture are about the sounds which have been called quackers. This strange sound was heard from the 1960s to the1980s by sailors in Russian submarines the North Atlantic and Arctic. Unfortunately, even the sonar- is an approach for discerning objects in underwater- was not able to recognize it. The article provides three theories for these marvelous sounds and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all of arguments dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that some believe that the quackers may have been created by male and female orca whales when they were in a courtship, particularly when male orca whale wanted to attract its mate. This point is challenged by the professor. She points out that this hypothesis fails to be correct because these creatures live in surface water not in the deep ocean water that quackers were heard.
Secondly, the article contends that there is a giant marine invertebrate which is called giant squid. It is an clever animal and can emit sound and since it includes a soft body; hence, sonar is not be able to detect it; in the contrast, the lecturer poses that we know that quackers lasted for two decades; however, this soft body species has been living for a long time in Atlantic and Arctic waters. They could not start and stop these types of sounds suddenly.
Finally, the reading passage states that there is a possibility that a foreign submarine from another country may have worked in these waters as spy. This argument is rebutted again. The professor expresses that the sounds were moving and changing in different directions fast. Besides, such the submarines usually produce a noise due to their engine; however, this engine noise was not detected by sonar. The lecturer elaborates on this by mentioning that even nowadays; we do not have such a silent and fast technology as submarine.
- do you agree or disagree? life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 85
- In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 90
- tpo31 80
- in times of an economic crises, in which area should governments reduce their spending?1- scientific researches2-art3-park and public gardens 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...rate which is called giant squid. It is an clever animal and can emit sound and si...
^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...cludes a soft body; hence, sonar is not be able to detect it; in the contrast, the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92966360856 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44999747591 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577981651376 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9420113929 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377885088289 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105215751572 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684631690714 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21001980073 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200656780092 0.0443174109184 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.