TPO32(integrated)
In this set of materials, both the reading passage and the lecture discussed possible reasons that might caused "quackers" sounds heard in Russian submarines. The reading proposed three testimonies which might have caused the odd sounds. However, the lecture repudiated what stated in the reading passage resting upon fallacious premises and provides three counterclaims proofing that all that evidences could be rejected by experts.
Firstly, the reading argued that perhaps the sounds are made by ocra whales during a courtship ritual, as studies showed the sound they make for attracting a male are like those sound that had been heard in submarines. The professor contradicted this point by acknowledging that as whales live near the surface of water and submarines sails deep in ocean, this evidences is unlikely to be plausible. Moreover, no sonar ever has been detected whales nearby.
Secondly, the article claimed that maybe giant squids are the sources of that sound. Notwithstanding, the lecture highlighted that squids are always living in deep ocean, although this sound was only reported for one decade and suddenly disappeared. This claim could not answer the question that why the sound started and why it stopped.
Lastly, the article contended that another country's submarines and their related sounds from military technologies are to be blamed. This seemed to be incorrect as explained in the lecture. The speaker articulated that those sounds were moving around and changing directions very quickly, besides no noise has been ever reported from engines of other submarines. While there is no submarine with such characteristics this speculation could not be defended.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2015-07-06 | negin papen | 70 | view |
- TPO16 (integrated) 90
- Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument According to a recent report cheating among college and university students is on the rise 50
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 60
- TPO19(independent)Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. 80
- TPO25(independent) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.Young people nowadays do not give enough time to help their communities. 60
that might caused "quackers" sounds
that might have caused "quackers" sounds
the sound they make for attracting a male are like those sound
the sounds ... are like those sounds
Sentence: The professor contradicted this point by acknowledging that as whales live near the surface of water and submarines sails deep in ocean, this evidences is unlikely to be plausible.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to submarines and sails
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and evidences
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 263 250
No. of Characters: 1398 1200
No. of Different Words: 156 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.027 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.316 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.656 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 82 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.231 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.368 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.538 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.332 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.586 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.063 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4