TPO34 sea cow
In the passage, the author provides three theories that may lead to the extinction of the sea cow. However, in the lecture, the professor thinks the passage is full of holes, and he opposes that from all three aspects.
To begin with, in the passage, the author simply states that the sea cows may have been overhunted by native people for food. Nevertheless, in the lecture, the professor holds the view that the sea cow is usually big and weighs up to ten tons so that it is difficult for the native to catch. Moreover, the sea cows are massive, and the number of local people is not large, so there is no need for them to hunt many.
The second point the professor refutes is ecosystem disturbances. In the passage, the author illustrates that kelp which is the sea cow's main food has declined so that the sea cows do not have much food to eat, leading to the extinction. But in the lecture, the professor raises the evidence that other kinds of fish which also feed on kelp do not decrease. Thus, it is not convinced to draw the conclusion.
Finally, the last evidence the professor adopts to challenge the passage is fur trade. In the passage, the author makes point that the sea cow is nearly extinct just when the European came. On the contrary, in the lecture, the professor states that the sea cow has been declined hundreds times less than several years before, so it is none of European's business.
To sum up, the passage is not logically sound according to the statement in the lecture.
- Some people have ambitious dreams and keep pursuing them, but other people always focus on realistic goals and try to achieve them. Which do you think is better and why? 60
- TPO54 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Website. 80
- tpo33Carved stone balls 65
- TPO27 Little Ice Age 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, thus, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61623616236 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41281577996 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483394833948 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 2.5761589404 388% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1607733628 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2307692308 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38915577187 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140544466802 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127430825079 0.0662205650399 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201790091342 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116220284807 0.0443174109184 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.2367328918 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.