tpo42
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the efficacy of three solutions mentioned as the responses for preventing injuries to birds. While the reading part lists these three solutions as the best options to overcome this problem, the professor counters these particular points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the reading passage.
First of all, the passage posits the one-way glass, which makes the windows look like a solid barrier from outside, as a possible solution for this incident. However, the instructor casts doubt on the accuracy of this claim. As he states, the one-way windows act just like the mirror. As a result, they have the reflection of the sky and trees. Besides, the birds are not able to distinguish the picture reflected by the mirror with the real sense; consequently, the birds will fly through the window as the past, and the one-way windows are ineffective.
Next, meanwhile, the article mentions to the colorful strips designs on the regular windows as a feasible accountable for this issue; the lecturer refutes this possibility. Based on his assertion, since there are some openings on the windows to let in the lights, the birds assume them as the holes, and they just eager to fly through the holes. Therefore, they will have the accident. They can prevent this accident by making the opening too tiny, which in this case, the adequate lighting for inside will be diminished. Thus, this solution cannot be responsible for this problem.
Finally, the text assumes that the magnetic field can be beneficial inasmuch as it navigates the birds’ direction; hence, the building with the magnetic field can guide birds away. On the contrary, the professor challenges the feasibility of this solution by mentioning to the effectivity of the magnetic field in the long distance. The birds use the magnetic field in the long distance journey such as the migration from the cold area to the hot spot in the winter. On the other hand, for the short distance such as in the city movement, the eyes and the brightness of lights are effective for the navigation. Consequently, the magnetic field would not present the expected function to address this problem, and it would be abortive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2022-04-20 | lhklin | 70 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | DarkSaitama | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | Maryam_zn | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | incoco | 80 | view |
- 1.Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and t 50
- tpo31 86
- It has recently been announced that a new movie theater may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- 1 True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 34
- 1.Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In de 62
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238317757009 0.261695866417 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.105140186916 0.158904122519 66% => OK
Adjectives: 0.088785046729 0.0723426182421 123% => OK
Adverbs: 0.035046728972 0.0435111971325 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0210280373832 0.0277247811725 76% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130841121495 0.128828473217 102% => OK
Participles: 0.018691588785 0.0370669169778 50% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61298668051 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0233644859813 0.0208969081088 112% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.193925233645 0.128158765124 151% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0210280373832 0.0158828679856 132% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00467289719626 0.0114777025283 41% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2272.0 1645.83664459 138% => OK
No of words: 378.0 271.125827815 139% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01058201058 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.04852973271 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.349206349206 0.374372842146 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.296296296296 0.287516216867 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.214285714286 0.187439937562 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.108465608466 0.113142543107 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61298668051 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515873015873 0.539623497131 96% => OK
Word variations: 56.1305352649 53.8517498576 104% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 22.2352941176 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9883205814 49.3711431718 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.647058824 132.220823453 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2352941176 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.941176470588 0.878197800319 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 51.8649237473 50.5018328374 103% => OK
Elegance: 2.40579710145 1.90840788429 126% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.527560240424 0.549887131256 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.180665497681 0.142949733639 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.106146728094 0.0787303798458 135% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.678316171464 0.631733273073 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155551359407 0.139662658121 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.265059640743 0.266732575781 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842396186548 0.103435571967 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.59220342859 0.414875509568 143% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0398519433565 0.0530846634433 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.407968137861 0.40443939384 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418679421879 0.0528353158467 79% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.