TPO43 - agnostids and related theories
The reading claims that there are three theories about agnostids which are categorized in marine animals group and their fossils had been found in rocks. Based on some evidence (uncountable) of fossils' records, agnostids are so similar to arthropods. However, lecturer refutes the evidence by some prominent reasons.
The first, Reading explains the theory of free-swimming predator in which agnostids are the predators that hunted small animals based on the same feature as arthropods which are so fast swimmers’ predator. On the contrary, the lecturer rejects this theory by explaining that arthropods have large well-developed eyes, unlike agnostids that were blind and could not swim in the ocean.
The second theory which reading explains is the seafloor dwellers which is the life’s way of primitive arthropodos that makes possible agnostids lived in this way too. Conversely, the lecturer takes the view that they didn't have the ability to move fast in a large distance.
The third one is that agnostids might live on the feeding off large animals such as fleas, ticks and mites. However, the lecturer claims that their population was not large and they were a small group of animals.
- TPO45- the evidence of the existence of bees more than 200 million years ago. 3
- TPO44: the silver coin which is founded in US is genuine evidence or the fake one? 78
- TPO45 -integrated writting 3
- Do you agree or disagree?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organized. 76
- Do you agree or disagree? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
..., the lecturer takes the view that they didnt have the ability to move fast in a larg...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 192.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27604166667 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68139143469 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9295745213 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.555555556 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37812827836 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151055392479 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073749345427 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227692642206 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358838947195 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.