TPO43_Int
The article states that there are several different theories about how agnostides may have lived because the fossil information does not give certain information about how they behaved and provides three different theories. However, the professor states that the theories are seriously weak and refutes each of the author's theories.
The first theory proposes that the agnostides may have been free-swimming predators. In contrast, the professor refutes this theory by stating that being a predator needs well-developed eyes, but the agnostides had poorly eyes. She explains that in order to track the prey they needed to have other sensory organs, but the fossils don not show any evidence about these sensors.
The second theory states that the agnostides may dwelled on the seafloor. However, the lecturer contends that seafloor dwellers are not fast animals and they can not go far distances. She says that they live in localized areas, but the agnostides which were found in different places, indicate that they were pretty fast and able to go large distances.
The Third theory holds the view that the agnostides were parasites. However, the professor casts doubt over this theory and explains that population of parasites animals is not very large because they finally kill their host. She says that the population of the agnostides were very large which refutes this theory.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-05 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-03-02 | taisuke571 | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-31 | nj-me | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | 想不到一个好名字 | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | yqkqknct | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
The article states that there are several different theories about how agnostides may have ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, well, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27149321267 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50321551568 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524886877828 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6555555444 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.909090909 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400311781342 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169325262253 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971587034917 0.0662205650399 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241459109511 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319954037796 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.