TPO44
In the reading passage, the author claims that the silver coin does not brought to North America by the Norse, who were European explorers traveled acroos the Atlantic ocean, by pointing out three reasons of support. However, finding all the idea implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and states that there are strong evidence which coorroborates that the Norse were in contanct with North America.
At first,the author argues that the long distance between Maine and North America, which was the settelment of the Norse, makes their conection infeasible. Conversely, the lecturer contend that there are some other subjects in addition to the coin in that region. Therefore, there is a viable explanation for this proof. In fact, thaving traveled to North America, they obtained some objects. On the way back to Maine, they brought the coin back with themselves.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that unavailability of other objects aside from the coin render this idea impersuasive. On the other hand, the professor dismisses this point by clarifying the fact that the Norse were not permament settellers. In fact,having moved to another region, they packed all of their precious possessions. Consequently, it is not weird that when they back to North America, nothing left behind them since they carried and brought them to the new place.
Finally, the author asserts that theire is not any justification that explains the aim of carrying silver coin to North amerca while they knew the coins could not have been regarded as a money. The professor, though, disputes this idea by subscribing the fact that the Norse were awar of this issue that they can trade with whatever seems appealing for those living in North america. Subsequently, as far as silver coins were attractive for indivudulas such as jweleries or necklesser, they could use them as a means to trade.
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both views and give 89
- A/D: in the modern word we should never impolite to another person. 90
- TPO9 3
- TPO 1 - Intergrated:4 days working instead of 5 day 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...or claims that the silver coin does not brought to North America by the Norse, who were...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... contanct with North America. At first,the author argues that the long distance be...
^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , having
...e were not permament settellers. In fact,having moved to another region, they packed al...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'money'.
Suggestion: money
...e coins could not have been regarded as a money. The professor, though, disputes this i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey could use them as a means to trade.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, in addition, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10344827586 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66131092499 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.988708192 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.285714286 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356264401063 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115592510873 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652708608597 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221302364077 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461511146667 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.