tpo46
The reading claims that doctors in United States should utilize electronic data-based for storing their patients’ medical records and provides three reason of support. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents several points to refute them all.
First, the author argues that electronic data-based provides doctors to reduce the cost of storing. Conversely, the lecturer casts doubt on this idea by stating that doctors should keep the paper forms of their data because of legal issues and having a back for their electronic data. So, it does not reduce the costs which doctors should pay.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that electronic data-bases assist doctors to reduce their error and their mistakes. In contrast, the lecturer underlines the fact that it does not reduce the amount of errors because doctors still use pens and papers for their works and their staffs convert these paper-based records to the electronic records. As a result, this work could not eliminates the amounts of errors due to the illegible handwriting.
Finally, the reading states that these electronic records help scientists to conduct their researches. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that performing researches is still difficult for doctors how use these electronic records, mainly because of medical privacy laws. She states that these strict laws do not allow researchers to utilize these information, unless they have a permission for patients and they always do not allow doctors to use their medical information. So, it is fallacious conclusion to say that electronic data-bases pave scientists’ way to do their works.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'eliminate'
Suggestion: eliminate
...cords. As a result, this work could not eliminates the amounts of errors due to the illegi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 371, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...aws do not allow researchers to utilize these information, unless they have a permission for pati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'in contrast', 'as a result', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266891891892 0.261695866417 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.14527027027 0.158904122519 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0844594594595 0.0723426182421 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0472972972973 0.0435111971325 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0574324324324 0.0277247811725 207% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108108108108 0.128828473217 84% => OK
Participles: 0.0168918918919 0.0370669169778 46% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.70788667315 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0371621621622 0.0208969081088 178% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.108108108108 0.128158765124 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0135135135135 0.0158828679856 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00675675675676 0.0114777025283 59% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1695.0 1645.83664459 103% => OK
No of words: 266.0 271.125827815 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.37218045113 6.08160592843 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.424812030075 0.374372842146 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.308270676692 0.287516216867 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184210526316 0.187439937562 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.135338345865 0.113142543107 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70788667315 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 51.3120434305 53.8517498576 95% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.1666666667 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3037658354 49.3711431718 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.25 132.220823453 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 0.878197800319 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 52.9937343358 50.5018328374 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.56756756757 1.90840788429 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.510996821015 0.549887131256 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.138102028414 0.142949733639 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0659081097025 0.0787303798458 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.625397559631 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.108591967656 0.139662658121 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.240134011811 0.266732575781 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100089278354 0.103435571967 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.467407772766 0.414875509568 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0648747679074 0.0530846634433 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.374719976921 0.40443939384 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356515553587 0.0528353158467 67% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.62251655629 193% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.