tpo47
In this set of material the reading and listening part discuss whether pterosaurs were capable powered flight or not. Listening section casts doubt on the information presented in the reading part by refusing the reasons that are mentioned in the passage.
First, the article poses that since they were cold-blooded animals and their metabolism was low so they could not absorb enough energy to fly. In contrast, the professor underlines the fact that according to their fossil records their body was covered by dense hair-like cover and fur which is the main attributes of warm-blooded animals. In fact, these furs helped them to keep their body temperature under control and maintain their body warm. This means that due to their fast metabolism and existences of furs there was no need to consume more energy to keep themselves warm. By providing these features, the professor claims that they did not need more energy to fly.
Furthermore, the author holds the view that because of their giant skeleton, it is unconvincing they were able to fly. However, the lecture postulates that their body weight was so light compared to their size. Actually, she states that the structure of their bones was full of hollows which caused to reduce their weight. This means that the weight of their body was light enough despite their size, thereby these attributes allowed them to flap their wings easily, and their flight is not as impossible as the text says.
Finally, according to the text, their rare legs were too weak to make it possible to launch. Conversely, the professor disagrees with this point and explains that there are apparently differences between birds and pterosaur pushing off. She elaborates this state by comparing the launch procedure of birds with pterosaur, which means that birds mostly use their two legs during launch time, although the pterosaur utilized from all their four limbs. By running on the ground and using their four limbs there was no trouble to jump and fly for them.
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 80
- tpo 48 80
- tpo47 80
- TPO 28 3
- Students are influenced more by their teachers than by their friends 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this set of material the reading and ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns that are mentioned in the passage. First, the article poses that since they...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they did not need more energy to fly. Furthermore, the author holds the view t...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is not as impossible as the text says. Finally, according to the text, their ra...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s no trouble to jump and fly for them.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 22.412803532 223% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02694610778 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4181035363 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538922155689 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.882386758 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.933333333 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299533778475 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107441118428 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571684270784 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176623252871 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425984611329 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.