tpo48
Both the reading and listening parts offers two opposite outlooks about the effectiveness of methods for refuging and endanger frog population. while the passage lists the possible causes of population decrement and their solutions; the professor, on the other hand, cast doubts on the accuracy of either the problems or the provided solutions.
First of all, the text mentioned to the usage of pesticides by farmers which contaminate frog’s habitat and has fatal effect on them, it also said that by the prevention of their usage in the farmland close to the frogs' habitat, they would be safe. On the contrary, the instructor challenges this proposal as it is not practical and fair. As she explains, the use of pesticide is for decrement of crop loss by the pests and insects, and it leads to the increment of yield in a competitive marketing system. By this solution, the farmers, whose farms are next to frogs living spots, will severely be affected and missed lots of crop and yield in the market. Thus, this proposal is not possible and beneficial for the farmers.
Secondly, in the article, another adduced reason for population decrement is listed as fungus which thickens and infected frogs' skin and leads to their death by dehydration. The text also refers to the antifungal medicine to treat sensitive frogs as a feasible solution for this problem. On the other hand, the lecturer rejects the efficiency of this treatment too. As she asserts, the treatment should be done on individually, which means each frog should be captured and medicine applied separately, by the consideration of the huge population of frogs, this action seems arduous. Furthermore, the treatment does not impact the offspring; consequently, the treatment should be repeated in each generation for the prevention of infection. So, this solution is not practical for controlling the decreasing population.
Finally, meanwhile, the passage highlighted the distraction of the natural water habitats as the main reason of population decrement; and purposed monitoring the human's activities and protection of wetlands to recover the frog’s species; the professor, on the contrast, refutes this cause. As she describes, mankind's activities are not the main threaten of wetland disappearance; global warming is the main factor of this event. Even with controlling the people's activities, the water loses by global warming would not be hampered. So, this solution does not address the problem since does not deal with the main cause.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? the ability to maintain a friendship with a small number of people over a long period is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 73
- Our previous experience has been that our stores are most profitable in areas where residents are highly concerned with leading healthy lives. We should therefore build one of our new stores in Plainsville, which clearly has many such residents. Plainsvil 16
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position 50
- The following appeared in an editorial in a business magazine."Although the sales of Whirlwind video games have declined over the past two years, a recent survey of video-game players suggests that this sales trend is about to be reversed. The survey 39
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... refuging and endanger frog population. while the passage lists the possible causes o...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he problems or the provided solutions. First of all, the text mentioned to the ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...heir usage in the farmland close to the frogs habitat, they would be safe. On the con...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 628, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun crop seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of crops'.
Suggestion: lots of crops
...s, will severely be affected and missed lots of crop and yield in the market. Thus, this pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssible and beneficial for the farmers. Secondly, in the article, another adduce...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...controlling the decreasing population. Finally, meanwhile, the passage highligh...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in fact, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 5.01324503311 559% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 1373.03311258 156% => OK
No of words: 404.0 270.72406181 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30693069307 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99815729441 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 145.348785872 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502475247525 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 419.366225166 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3003176707 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.117647059 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7647058824 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30867348465 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912083202932 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734610515671 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178076543763 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524126379786 0.0443174109184 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 63.6247240618 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.