TPO48
The reading claims that there are three methods which can be used for preventing the problem of declining frog populations. However, the professor explains that the solutions mentioned in reading are not practical solutions and refutes each of author reasons.
First, frogs are harmed by pesticides which are chemicals used by a farmer to save their crops from insects and this chemical damage frog's breathing system. Nevertheless, the speaker opposes this point by saying that reducing or regulate law to prohibit using pesticides have many disadvantages for the farmer and this causes many of their crops damage and by not using pesticides they can not compete with others farmer.
Second, based on the reading, a fungus which spread around the world have a deathly effect on frog and is major factor decrease in frog population. Conversely, the professor states that we have to catch frog individual for treatment its skin fungus and on a large scale it is a difficult task to do. Also, for preventing this problem we have to use this work again and again which is complicated and cost a lot.
Third, according to the reading, frog's natural habitats can be saved, if the government set role to prevent using their natural habitats. In contrast, the lecturer contradicts this point reasoning that global warming is threatened natural habitats of frog and because of it, many water habitats are disappeared. In fact, preventing the human activities is unlikely to help saving water habitats of frogs.
Therefore, specifies reasons mentioned in the reading do not make sense.
- TPO 34 81
- The extended family is less important now than it was in the past 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 71
- TPO 32 76
- TPO 12 - It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.test sth 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to save' or 'save'.
Suggestion: to save; save
...he human activities is unlikely to help saving water habitats of frogs. Therefore, sp...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12403100775 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66746652868 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550387596899 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6186643038 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.181818182 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474324194506 0.272083759551 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17641190536 0.0996497079465 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114892027633 0.0662205650399 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218885381215 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122280570471 0.0443174109184 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.