TPO49 Integrated Writing
The speaker and the writer hold divergent attitude towards humpbacks use stars to navigate and migrate long distances. Through relevant reasons and examples, the professor extensively opposes the content in the article.
Frist, the author brings up humpback is intelligent enough to utilize the stars. To refute this point, the lecturer emphasizes that there is no actual connection between intelligence and star navigation. He cites the animal, which also uses the star to navigate but has an average intelligence to illustrate his point, which contradicts the assumption in the passage. He further adds that the humpback is born with the ability to navigate. It is an incidence.
Second, the writer advocates that because humpbacks use straight lines to migrate so they orient themselves by the external force such as the star, and they swim in the ocean without the landmark to guide them except the star, however, as is rebutted by the speaker earth magnetic field plays a role in their navigation. Their body has biomagnetic field that is sensitive to the magnetic field. When they sense the earth magnetic field, they can navigate, which objects to what the passage suggests.
Third, opposing the writer’s belief that the spy-hopping can indicate the humpback is looking at the star, the professor contends that sharks also demonstrate spy-hopping and they neither migrate nor look for stars. Furthermore, humpback also does spy-hopping in the daytime which has no star at all. Thus，spy-hopping can't support the hypothesis that humpback uses star to navigate and migrate long distances, which completely rejects the viewpoint shown in the passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'average intelligence'.
Suggestion: average intelligence
... also uses the star to navigate but has an average intelligence to illustrate his point, which contradi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ch has no star at all. Thus，spy-hopping cant support the hypothesis that humpback u...
^^^^
Line 7, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hopping cant support the hypothesis that humpback uses star to navigate and migra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, look, second, so, third, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3893129771 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84173570251 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553435114504 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.6041228615 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.615384615 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318047259825 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10343841198 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697653331109 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176204571618 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545986911146 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.