The lecture and the reading both discsses the great houses of the Chaco Caneyon. while the reading passage presented three theories that support its argument about these great houses being used as residential unites dwelled by hundreds of families. The lecture has refutes every single theory presented.
first of all, the reading states that one theory that proof these great houses were purley residential s that, the Chaco houses were large in size like the modern apartment buildings nowadays. And it can hold hundreds of people in it. The professor in the lecture opposed this, by saying that, although it looks large from the outside and similar to the latest American buildings, however, few fire places were found. The professor also mentions that there were few rooms been founf inside the houses and questioned how could few rooms and few burners inside will proof that hundred of people were live their and met their daily needs?
Second, the reading says that the second theory that support its argument is that the Chaco houses were used to store food. The lecture counter this argument by stating that it was not supported by evidence.
the professsor explains that although it sound plausable, excavations could not uncover mny traces of the maise or other containersthat contain the stored maise in there.
Lastly, the reading says that athird theory is that these house were used as ceremonial centers. the reading supported its claim by the excavation findings of lots of large pots in there. The lecture refutes this theory and considers it not well supported. The lectrure explaines that there were other building materials been found inside like sand, stones and construction trash that might been left by the costruction workeres, and this makes it not a great evidence that the large quantity of pots were used in ceremonial occasions.
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 73
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement. always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people . Use specific details and examples to support your answer. 70
- tpo 7.1. 3
- TPO5: Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement ( parents are the best teachers. use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... the great houses of the Chaco Caneyon. while the reading passage presented three the...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...refutes every single theory presented. first of all, the reading states that one the...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: large
...sidential s that, the Chaco houses were large in size like the modern apartment buildings now...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...that it was not supported by evidence. the professsor explains that although it so...
^^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sounds'?
Suggestion: sounds
...he professsor explains that although it sound plausable, excavations could not uncove...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... house were used as ceremonial centers. the reading supported its claim by the exca...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, lastly, look, second, so, third, well, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08823529412 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34995498597 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503267973856 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6194709913 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.214285714 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0492548196129 0.272083759551 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0196865890093 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0169880942681 0.0662205650399 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.031617896584 0.162205337803 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124514178882 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.