The reading and the lecture both discuss the aspect of assigning a project to a team of people and the effects of it. the reading supports this aspect by giving three benefits could be attained of it, however, the lecture refutes every single one of them.
First, the reading says that this will be of a great benefit to the project. working in a group means many people with knowledge, expertise and skilles will work better than asingle individual will do.
The professor challenged that by discussing that this is going to be like a free ride for some people in thegroup. they will invertually will get recognition when the job is being well done.But the real contriputer will not be satisfied if they have been asked about the recognition to the group, because thier own efforts will not be addressed and this will create the negative attude.
second, the reading says that the group can work more quickly and respond to the risky situations by making creative solutions unlike one individual could tackle. The professor, on the other hand, refutes this, saying that this will be a time cosuming to reach to conssitency. he support his claime by saying that the presence of two or many influencer in the group will afect the disicion making. As a result if the influencers said that this idea will never work, the idea will be drops by the group even if there were supporters for it, they would be, eventually, ignored.
lastly the reading takes about how rewarding is the success of the project to all group members. again the influencer of the team will best benefir the other members upon the success of the project, The lecture, again, aregue aginst this, by mentioning that if the project fails, the blame will be on all the group, and those who are the influencer of the team will not be recognised for the failure or even for the success of the project.
a group wil consume more time to make a descision in the risky situations.
- TPO 7 - Integrated essay 3
- TPO 1, Integrated Writing 3
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 73
- younger people unlike elders, they enjoy life moreagree or disagree 70
- tpo 7.1. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Working
...l be of a great benefit to the project. working in a group means many people with knowl...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... free ride for some people in thegroup. they will invertually will get recognition w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...gnition when the job is being well done.But the real contriputer will not be satisf...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
... this will create the negative attude. second, the reading says that the group can wo...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... time cosuming to reach to conssitency. he support his claime by saying that the p...
^^
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun influencer seems to be countable; consider using: 'many influencers'.
Suggestion: many influencers
...e by saying that the presence of two or many influencer in the group will afect the disicion ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lastly
...t, they would be, eventually, ignored. lastly the reading takes about how rewarding i...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Again
...ss of the project to all group members. again the influencer of the team will best be...
^^^^^
Line 53, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
... a group wil consume more time to make a d...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, well, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 5.04856512141 376% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1373.03311258 142% => OK
No of words: 343.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66472303207 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42473070489 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498542274052 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.4151158533 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.461538462 110.228320801 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351932651516 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129965673367 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586610281624 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179968045022 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566493827419 0.0443174109184 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.3589403974 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.2367328918 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.