TPO54
The professor revises the idea presented in the reading passage that proposes three possible solutions to solve the problem concerning the high concentration of salt in the Salton Sea in California and refutes each of the points made in the passage.
First of all, the reading suggests that the salt could be eliminated directly by pumping out the water and evaporating it to remove the remnant solid materials. On the other hand, the professor argues against this view by pointing out that this measure could bring about serious problems. According to the lecturer, although the solid materials contain mostly salt, there are other types of substances left behind that a handful of them could be very threatening. For instance, selenium is a plausible toxic residual substance that can be released into the air and cause serious health problems when people breathe it. Thus, the first option does not seem realistic and practical.
Secondly, the author proposes that mixing ocean water with a lower percentage of salt in with the lake water can balance the level of salinity of the lake water. On the contrary, the professor holds a different view. She maintains that this approach requires a large number of long pipelines and canals that can be extremely expensive. The government may not have enough resources to invest in such a vast project. Therefore, the second idea has serious deficiencies regarding the main point of the text.
Finally, the professor's opinion contradicts the third point mentioned in the text that believes a system of constructed walls for dividing the lake into a couple of parts with non-identical salt densities can solve the problem. She clarifies that this system is not likely to last for a long time since the area is prone to frequent and intense geological activities. Thus, a major earthquake can cause enormous damage to the system and destroy it. As a result, the high salinity portion of water will merge into the low salinity again. Hence, the third solution is not convincing, too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | D.Dgfd | 76 | view |
| 2021-12-26 | shabnam_520 | 76 | view |
| 2021-03-05 | taisuke571 | 85 | view |
- Why do you think some people are attracted to dangerous sports or other dangerous activities? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your community. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory? Explain your position. 76
- TPO45 73
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with 55
- TPO54 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e maintains that this approach requires a large number of long pipelines and canals that can be e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... main point of the text. Finally, the professors opinion contradicts the third point men...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, for instance, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05654761905 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63157010363 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.920170008 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.1875 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.