trip to Mars
The main topic of the lecture and the article is whether or not we can send humans to Mars. The writer is skeptical and provides some problems with this plan, but the speaker provides solutions to each problem presented by the writer.
To begin with, the author thinks that, unlike the trip to the moon which was only a few days, the trip to Mars can last up to two years, and this would cause a problem because humans need water, food, and oxygen. The lecturer casts doubt on this claim. She states that they can bring hydro-panics with them. hydro-panics are some plants that grow with their roots in the water. This way, astronauts can cultivate their food, and use the oxygen that the plant makes for breathing. Moreover, these plants recycle water, so the water problem could be fixed as well.
Secondly, the author posits that spending that much time in space could greatly harm a human, as it would reduce one's muscle mass and bone density. The professor challenges the validity of this point by saying that, even now many astronauts spent months in zero gravity. They do regular exercise to keep their muscles, and they also take supplements such as calcium to protect their bone density.
Lastly, the author contends that sum produces harmful radiation. Because of the earth's gravity, they are eliminated on earth, but in the trip to Mars, they can be extremely harmful to humans. Furthermore, a shield to protect the spaceship is too heavy, so it can not be a solution. The lecturer, however, asserts that sun radiations are temporary. The spaceship can contain a little shield only for the time the radiations are activated, for the humans to shelter there. This way it can be less heavy and practical for the plan.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-02 | mojan izadkhah | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | nagy | 52 | view |
- posibily of living on Venus 3
- giving children money for their good grades in schools 70
- TED and turtles 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement it is more important for governments to spend money into internet access than to improve public transprtation 52
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world Use reasons and details to support your opinion 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...in topic of the lecture and the article is whether or not we can send humans to Ma...
^^
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...topic of the lecture and the article is whether or not we can send humans to Mars. The writer ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hydro-panics
... they can bring hydro-panics with them. hydro-panics are some plants that grow with their ro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...reatly harm a human, as it would reduce ones muscle mass and bone density. The profe...
^^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...duces harmful radiation. Because of the earths gravity, they are eliminated on earth, ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76744186047 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35662713647 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568106312292 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3418286075 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4117647059 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0922344083337 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0221370955241 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679664149077 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0442303500811 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550088452433 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.